ON THE ISSUE OF DIACHRONIC TYPOLOGICAL STUDIES
Keywords:
Theoretical linguistics, semantics, synchronic research, diachronic research, dichotomy, language universals, borrowings, grammatical categories, comparative linguistics.Abstract
This article examines the problem of the relationship between synchronic and diachronic approaches to language analysis, emphasizing their complementary nature. Contemporary achievements in semantics and cognitive linguistics, which are based on the influence of cognitive factors on the semantic development of words, raise important questions about how to integrate these approaches for a deeper understanding of linguistic processes. This work proposes overcoming one-sidedness in the training of linguists in higher education to more fully consider both aspects—synchrony and diachrony—in language analysis. Special attention is given to interdisciplinary methods that allow for the combination of synchronic analysis of linguistic structures with diachronic study of their historical development. Such an approach helps form a comprehensive understanding of language as a dynamic system, accounting for both its current states and historical changes, which, in turn, can enrich the educational process and improve the quality of training specialists in linguistics.
References
Benveniste, E. (1976). The Origin of Language and Linguistics. Moscow: Nauka.
Grebenshchikov, V. N. (2015). Diachronic Typology: Methodology and Practice. St. Petersburg: RGPU Publishing.
Zalevskaya, A. A. (2004). Typological Linguistics: Issues and Perspectives. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.
Kostromina, I. V. (2018). Language Changes and Their Typology: Historical Aspects. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 9: Philology, 3, 17–28.
Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). Language and Knowledge: Towards Understanding the Nature of Parts of Speech from a Cognitive Perspective. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.
Levina, N. B. (2019). Comparative Typology: From Synchrony to Diachrony. Linguistic Analysis, 14(1), 45–60.
Martynenko, A. P. (2020). Historical Grammar and Diachrony in Modern Linguistics. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Nikolaeva, T. M. (2008). Non-Paradigmatic Linguistics. Moscow.
Solovyova, T. S. (2017). Language Changes in a Historical Perspective: A Typological Approach. Journal of Typological Linguistics, 6(2), 89–105.
Tikhomirov, A. I. (2016). Typology and Diachrony: Methodological Aspects of Research. Linguistic Studies, 5(4), 123–135.
Saussure, F. (1999). Course in General Linguistics. Ural University Press.
Shevchenko, V. P. (2014). A Brief Course in Comparative Linguistics. Moscow: Higher School.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.