THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF PRAGMATICS AND SOMATIC UNITS

Authors

  • Narzullayeva Firuza Olimovna Associate Professor of the Department of English Literature and Translation of Bukhara State University
  • Xikmatova Mohinur Uktamovna The 1st Grade Master Student of History and Philology Department of Asia International University

Keywords:

Pragmatics, somatic unit, expressions, sociolinguistics, pragmalinguistics, speech acts, deixis, conversational implicature, phraseological units, verbal and non-verbal sign systems.

Abstract

This article depicts the historical development and theoretical roots of pragmatics and somatic units within the framework of language and cognitive science and illustrates the disparity of pragmatics and somatic units, which may seem entirely different in the approaches they take but are both equally important in meaning formation; one takes on language and the other relies on experience. The multidisciplinary exploration gives the readers an insight from both historical and theoretical perspectives how language, body, and thought are intertwined in.

References

Batirkhanova, M. (2021). Pragmatic Features of Somatic Phraseologies and their Theoretical Significance. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 3(12), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijot.v3i12.2511 p42

Gadoyeva Mavlyuda Ibragimovna, & Subxonova Madina Otabek qizi. (2022). Mehnat va mehnatsevarlik haqidagi ingliz va o’zbek maqollarining semantic tahlili. Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes,311–313. Retrieved from http://www.conferenceseries.info/inde x.php/online/article/view/119

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Kubryakova E.S. The initial stages of the formation of cognitivism // Linguistics - Psychology - cognitive science. - M., 1994. VY No. 4. - p. 35-36.

Levinson S.C. Pragmatics. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. –210 p.

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.p15-45

Mavluda I.G. Somatik leksikaning xususiyatlari. Volume 2 ǀ issue 6 ǀ 2021 issn: 2181-1601.-bb. 1-2

Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika: Monografiya(pp. 76–80).

Searle, J.R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press, 1969), 1–20

O‘zME. (2000). Birinchi jild.Toshkent.p45

Вакк Ф.О. Соматические фразеологии в современном эстонском литературном языке: Автореф.дисс…канд. филол. наук.– Таллин, 1964.– С. 23

Верещагин Е.М., Костомаров В.Г. Язык и культура: Лингвострановедение в преподавании русского языка как иностранного . Методическое руководство. — 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М.: Русский язык, 1990. — C. 45.

Райхштейн А.Д. Сопоставительный анализ немецкой и русской фразеологии. – М.: Высшая школа, 1980. – Б. 5.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF PRAGMATICS AND SOMATIC UNITS. (2025). European Journal of Pedagogical Initiatives and Educational Practices, 3(5), 33-36. https://europeanscience.org/index.php/4/article/view/1372