THE ROLE OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN TEACHING ENGINEERING STUDENTS
Keywords:
Engineering education, technical literature, international collaboration, aerospace, nuclear energy, professional development, language proficiency.Abstract
The Russian language plays a significant role in the education of engineering students, particularly in fields where Russia has made substantial contributions, such as aerospace, nuclear energy, and materials science. Despite the dominance of English as the global language of science and technology, Russian remains a valuable tool for accessing a wealth of historical and technical literature, understanding key innovations, and participating in international collaborations. This article explores the importance of Russian language proficiency for engineering students, emphasizing its relevance in both academic and professional contexts. It examines how knowledge of Russian can enhance students’ ability to engage with research, technical documentation, and communicate in multinational projects, particularly in industries with strong Russian involvement. The article also discusses practical approaches to integrating Russian language learning into engineering curricula and the potential benefits for students pursuing careers in global industries.
References
Altun M. The Integration of Technology into Foreign Language Teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications., 2015, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.22-27.
Abduraxmanovna, Kh.Z. "Effective methods of teaching and learning architecture and construction terminology in higher education." ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 11.3 (2021): 1733-1737.
Allanyazov M.B. (2023). Using games as an efficient way of teaching vocabulary. American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 13, 58–60. Retrieved from https://americanjournal.org/index.php/ajrhss/article/view/962
Abduraxmanovna Z.K. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environment in Higher Education. American journal of science and learning for development. 2022 Dec 23;1(2):188-92.
Hyland, K. (2009). Specific purpose programs. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 201-217). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell. 6. Shuhratovna S. N., Saporbayevich A. O., Abdurahmanivna Z. H. Diachronic study of Uzbek and English architectural construction terms //Elementary Education Online. – 2021. – Т. 20. – №. 5. – С. 4659-4659.
Shukhratovna S. N. SYNTACTICALLY FORMED ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION TERMS IN ENGLISH, UZBEK AND RUSSIAN //Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL). – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 11. – С. 82-85.
Saloydinova N. S. ETYMOLOGY OF UZBEK AND ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE-CONSTRUCTION TERMINOLOGY //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 1013-1017.
Utemuratova, Z. A. "The use of motivational features of gaming technology in the study of the Russian language in non-linguistic universities." ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 11 (91) (2020): 39-42. 10. Okojie M, Olinzock A, Okojie-Boulder T. The pedagogy of technology integration. J Technol Stud. 2006;32(2):66–71. doi: 10.21061/jots.v32i2.a.1
Zakirova, Kh.A. "Terminology as a research object of linguistics and specific features of construction terminology." Theoretical & Applied Science 4 (2020): 149-151.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
